The Validity and Reliability of the Hungarian Version of the Brief Work-Family Conflict Questionnaire – An Effective Method to Measure Work-To-Family and Family-To-Work Conflict
dc.contributor.author | Mészáros, Veronika | |
dc.contributor.author | Kövi, Zsuzsanna | |
dc.contributor.author | Blanch Plana, Angel | |
dc.contributor.author | Ferenczi, Andrea | |
dc.contributor.author | Tanyi, Zsuzsanna | |
dc.contributor.author | Karai, Virág | |
dc.contributor.author | Hittner, James Bryant | |
dc.contributor.author | Kulig, Barbara | |
dc.contributor.author | Kovács, Dóra | |
dc.contributor.author | Smohai, Máté | |
dc.contributor.author | Ádám, Szilvia | |
dc.date.accessioned | 2023-01-11T13:09:34Z | |
dc.date.available | 2023-01-11T13:09:34Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2022 | |
dc.description.abstract | The current study aimed to investigate the validity and reliability of the Hungarian version of the brief Work-Family Conflict Questionnaire (Conflicto Trabajo – Familia, CCTF) using both homogeneous (social care workers, N = 206) and heterogeneous (N = 586) occupational samples. In order to examine construct validity, we explored both two-factor and bifactor models. Our findings provided greater support for the two-factor model (homogeneous sample: χ2 = 14.032, p = 0.379 df = 13; CFI = 0.999; NNFI = 0.998; RMSEA = 0.020 [0.000–0.051]; heterogeneous sample: χ2 = 40.213, p < 0.001 df = 13; CFI = 0.993; NNFI = 0.985; RMSEA = 0.060 [0.023–0.079]). Our results demonstrated good reliability (ω = 0.797–0.911) and predictive validity, which we tested by exploring the relation of the construct with burnout and psychosomatic symptoms. Our results suggest that the Hungarian version of the CCTF is a reliable and valid instrument for measuring both work-to-family and family-to-work conflict. | ca_ES |
dc.description.sponsorship | The preparation of the present study was supported by a research grant obtained from the Faculty of Humanities, Károli Gáspár University of the Reformed Church (Person- and Family-oriented Health Science Research Group, Grant No. 20643B800) | ca_ES |
dc.identifier.doi | https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.6309 | |
dc.identifier.issn | 1981-6472 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/10459.1/85219 | |
dc.language.iso | eng | ca_ES |
dc.publisher | PsychOpen | ca_ES |
dc.relation.isformatof | Reproducció del document publicat a https://doi.org/10.5964/ijpr.6309 | ca_ES |
dc.relation.ispartof | Interpersona, 2022, vol. 16, núm. 1, p. 2-16 | ca_ES |
dc.rights | cc-by (c) Mészáros et al., 2022 | ca_ES |
dc.rights.accessRights | info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess | ca_ES |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | * |
dc.subject | Brief Work-Family Conflict Questionnaire | ca_ES |
dc.subject | Conflicto Trabajo-Familia | ca_ES |
dc.subject | CCTF | ca_ES |
dc.subject | Construct and predictive validity | ca_ES |
dc.subject | Burnout | ca_ES |
dc.subject | Psychosomatic symptoms | ca_ES |
dc.title | The Validity and Reliability of the Hungarian Version of the Brief Work-Family Conflict Questionnaire – An Effective Method to Measure Work-To-Family and Family-To-Work Conflict | ca_ES |
dc.type | info:eu-repo/semantics/article | ca_ES |
dc.type.version | info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion | ca_ES |